Take a moment and check the label on your shirt. If it says “Made in Thailand” or “Made in China,” don’t be deceived; that tag tells only part of the story.
The cotton could have been grown in Nyakatozi-Kasese, dyed in India, buttons made in Botswana, design sketched in China, and only then stitched together in Thailand.
Welcome to the hidden world of Global Value Chains (GVCs), where production is fragmented across countries, each contributing what it does best. Today, 70–80 per cent of global trade flows through these chains.
Take the iPhone: designed in California, processors built in Taiwan, screens in Korea, accelerometers in Germany, batteries in China, assembled in India or China, and sold worldwide. That tiny device in your pocket is the product of at least six countries working in sync.
Uganda’s place in the global web
Where does Uganda fit?
GVCs are both opportunities and caution. They allow us to supply raw materials, semi-finished goods, or specialized services, creating jobs, attracting investment, and opening doors to global markets.
But if we only supply raw cotton, coffee, or unprocessed minerals, we remain at the bottom. Those who design, brand, and market the final product capture most of the profits. Uganda risks being locked in as a low-value participant.
The story is not fixed. Historically, Uganda relied on raw commodity exports. Today, there is a shift: crude oil must be refined locally before export. Climbing even one rank up the value chain changes everything.
The question is not just what we export, but who we want to be. Can Uganda become innovators, brand builders, and value creators?
Regional integration offers a stepping stone. The East African Community could become a mini-supply chain hub: Kenya’s floriculture, Uganda’s agriculture and oil, Rwanda’s ICT, and Tanzania’s minerals.
Specialization and intra-regional trade could raise competitiveness, build infrastructure, and give us leverage in global markets. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) then moves from dream to practical strategy.
Navigating the legal maze
GVCs are not just economic; they are legal. Every link involves contracts, compliance, taxes, and potential disputes across borders. Uganda must navigate these complexities:
- Contracts and arbitration: Delays, quality issues, or payment defaults are inevitable. International arbitration through ICC, UNCITRAL, or LCIA is often preferred, but should foreign arbitrators operate freely in Kampala, or be locally licensed first?
- Labor and human rights: Consumers increasingly care about ethics. Germany’s Supply Chain Due Diligence Act, for example, forces companies to ensure human rights and environmental standards throughout supply chains. Uganda must be ready.
- Tax, procurement, and fiscal policy: Attracting investors while safeguarding revenue, setting fair procurement standards, and aligning fiscal policies, wages, and expenditure with global expectations are critical.
- Force majeure and risk: Clarity on risk transfer is essential; without it, disputes escalate.
Efficiency vs. sovereignty
GVCs offer efficiency: lower costs, specialized skills, and flexibility. But efficiency comes with dependency. Uganda risks outsourcing its industrial future if it doesn’t act strategically.
Short-term savings at the expense of long-term sovereignty leave us vulnerable to shocks, while chasing sovereignty without planning risks isolation and high prices.
Uganda’s strategic path
To move from passenger to driver in global trade, Uganda must:
- Diversify suppliers and buyers for resilience.
- Build arbitration and negotiation capacity to manage cross-border disputes.
- Strengthen compliance laws in labour, tax, procurement, and fiscal policies.
- Leverage GVCs for technology transfer, climbing from raw materials to branded products.
- Invest in R&D and education, making innovation a survival tool.
- Use regional integration to gain collective bargaining power in East Africa.
Role of lawyers and policymakers
Lawyers and policymakers are central to this journey. They interpret Incoterms, negotiate cross-border contracts, navigate taxation treaties, enforce competition rules, and design fiscal policies that balance incentives with accountability.
They shape education and trade frameworks that make East Africa competitive. In short, they are not just arbiters; they are architects of Uganda’s economic future.
From raw material to finished product
GVCs are here to stay. The question is whether Uganda will remain a supplier of raw inputs or climb the ladder to become a hub for finished products, branding, and innovation.
The label on your shirt is more than fabric; it reflects Uganda’s place in the global economy. Right now, we are engaged in the cultivation of cotton, among other crops. With strategy, boldness, and legal innovation, we can one day own the shirt.
Uganda is already part of the global village. The time has come to decide: are we content with tilling the soil, or do we want to control the shop?
About the Author
