The detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu has declined to open his defence in his ongoing trial before the Federal High Court, Abuja, insisting that the terrorism charges filed against him were unlawful and invalid.
At the resumed hearing before Justice James Omotosho, Kanu, who had previously indicated plans to call witnesses and had applied for witness summons, told the court that after reviewing his case file, he found no legitimate basis for the allegations levelled against him by the Federal Government.
“I have gone through the case file, and I am convinced there is no valid charge against me,”
Kanu reportedly told the court. “Since the charge is invalid and the trial itself is unlawful, there is no need for me to open any defence.”
Kanu Withdraws Plan to Call Witnesses
The court had on October 24 adjourned the matter until October 27 to allow Kanu to open his defence following his earlier indication that he would call witnesses.
However, upon resumption on Monday, he announced his decision to suspend that plan and instead challenge the legality of the proceedings.
Justice Omotosho directed Kanu to put his position in writing and file a formal written address, which should be served on the prosecution.
The judge also advised the IPOB leader to seek the guidance of criminal law experts regarding the implications of his decision to forgo his defence, emphasizing that the move carries significant procedural consequences.
Next Steps in the Trial
After hearing from both sides, Justice Omotosho adjourned the case to November 4, 5, and 6, 2025, for the adoption of final written addresses.
The judge clarified that the adjourned dates would either be used for the adoption of the parties’ final addresses—based on Kanu’s claim that the prosecution failed to establish any case against him—or for the defendant to enter his defence if he chooses to do so.
Kanu, who has been in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS) since June 2021 following his re-arrest and extradition to Nigeria, is facing multiple counts bordering on terrorism, incitement, and unlawful broadcast.
The Federal Government has maintained that Kanu’s activities and statements as IPOB leader incited violence and threatened national security, claims he has consistently denied.
About the Author
